Libro de Visitas

Floydamava

22 Jan 2025 - 09:12 am

A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
[url=https://kra26c.cc]kraken зеркало[/url]

At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.

As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken официальный сайт
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.

Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.

The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.

And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.

Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.

It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.

Danielsed

22 Jan 2025 - 08:48 am

A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
[url=https://kra26c.cc]kraken войти[/url]

At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.

As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken магазин
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.

Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.

The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.

And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.

Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.

It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.

Davidzem

22 Jan 2025 - 08:41 am

Обзор деревянных изделий: ножки для мебели, балясины и вагонка

Древесные изделия занимают особенное место во всем мире дизайна интерьеров и мебели. Они придают уют, тепло и естественность любому помещению. В данном посте рассмотрим такие популярные элементы, как ножки для мебели, балясины и вагонка.

Ножки для мебели

Ножки для мебели играют ключевую роль в разработке общего стиля изделия. Им предоставляется возможность быть выполнены из различных пород дерева и иметь разнообразные формы и конструкции.

- Функциональность: Ножки не только поддерживают мебель, да и обеспечивают ее устойчивость.

- Дизайн: На рынке представлены ножки во многих стилях от классики до современного минимализма. Это позволяет каждый раз творить уникальные изделия, подчеркивающие индивидуальность интерьера.

- Материалы: Наиболее распространены бук, дуб и сосна, любая из которых обладает своими эстетическими и многофункциональными чертами.

Балясины

Балясина это вертикальный элемент, который употребляется для сотворения перил и ограждений. Они придают конструкции завершённый вид и дают обеспечение безопасность.

- Стиль и безопасность: Балясины могут быть как простыми, так и неповторимыми по дизайну, что делает их главным элементом в оформлении лестниц и балконов.

- Создание: Изготавливаются они, обычно, из прочной древесины. Известные варианты ель, лиственница и дуб.

- Устойчивость: Балясины обязаны быть крепкими, чтоб выдерживать нагрузку и выполнять свою защитную функцию.

Вагонка

Вагонка это один из самых известных материалов для отделки стен и потолков.

- Устойчивость и изоляция: Деревянная вагонка [url=https://35stupenek.ru/]https://35stupenek.ru/[/url] подсобляет создавать локальный климат в помещении, обеспечивая теплоизоляцию и звуконепроницаемость.

- Дизайн: Широкий выбор фактур и цветов позволяет использовать вагонку разных стилей интерьера, от традиционного до современного.

- Устойчивость: При правильной обработке вагонка будет служить долгие годы, сохраняя собственный оригинальный вид.

Заключение

Деревянные изделия, такие как ножки для мебели, балясины и вагонка, являются неотъемлемой частью современного дизайна интерьеров. Они дарят не только функциональность, да и эстетику, подчеркивая тепло и природную красу дерева. Выбор качественных изделий дозволит сделать гармоничное и уютное пространство, в каком месте будет комфортабельно находиться всем.

Danielber

22 Jan 2025 - 08:09 am

Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
[url=https://kra26c.cc]kraken войти[/url]
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”

For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.

The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra26c.cc
kra cc
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.

And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.

Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.

Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.

His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”

Moseseluct

22 Jan 2025 - 08:02 am

The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
[url=https://kra26c.cc]kraken сайт[/url]

Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken вход
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?

According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

Dustinunuri

22 Jan 2025 - 07:56 am

Я лучше просто промолчу
Создание такого детского дома было проявлением интернационализма и доброй воли советских граждан касательно [url=https://xn---1-6kcao3cdj.xn--p1ai/product/%d1%81%d0%b0%d0%bb%d0%b0%d1%82-%d0%ba%d0%b0%d0%b2%d0%ba%d0%b0%d0%b7%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%b8%d0%b9/]https://xn---1-6kcao3cdj.xn--p1ai/product/%d1%81%d0%b0%d0%bb%d0%b0%d1%82-%d0%ba%d0%b0%d0%b2%d0%ba%d0%b0%d0%b7%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%b8%d0%b9/[/url] осиротевшим детям борцов-антифашистов.

Anthonybuh

22 Jan 2025 - 07:45 am

Кто такие брокеры?

Брокеры это финансовые посредники, которые помогают инвесторам и трейдерам осуществлять сделки на финансовых базарах. Их основная функция заключается в том, чтобы объединять покупателей и продавцов, а также предоставлять доступ к различным инструментам, таким как акции, облигации, валюты и деривативы. Брокеры могут работать как в традиционных денег, так и в торговле криптовалютами.

Типы брокеров

Существует несколько типов брокеров:

1. Дискаунт-брокеры: предлагают услуги по более низким комиссиям, но имеют ограниченное количество аналитических приборов и помощи.

2. Полномасштабные брокеры: предоставляют широкий спектр услуг, включая консультации и анализ.

3. Он-лайн-брокеры: дают возможность трейдерам вести сделки через интернет-платформы, что делает торговлю более доступной.

Как избрать правильного брокера?

Выбор брокера может быть сложной задачей. Вот несколько главных качеств, на которые стоит обратить внимание:

1. Лицензия и регулирование: удостоверьтесь, что брокер зарегистрирован и регулируется влиятельными финансовыми организациями.

2. Комиссии и сборы: ознакомьтесь с тарифами на сделки и всеми сопутствующими сборами. Некие брокеры могут взимать скрытые комиссии.

3. Торговая платформа: проверьте, комфортна ли платформа для вас. Некие платформы предлагают дополнительные инструменты и функции для анализа рынка.

4. Качество обслуживания: обратите внимание на отзывы клиентов о поддержке. Хороший брокер обязан предоставить оперативную и доброкачественную помощь.

5. Доступные финансовые инструменты: удостоверьтесь, что брокер предлагает те приборы, которые вам нужны для торговли [url=https://kulturologia.ru/news/8577/]Eternal отзывы[/url]

6. Образовательные ресурсы: наличие обучающих материалов возможно полезным для начинающих трейдеров.

7. Минимальный депозит: некие брокеры требуют высокий начальный капитал для открытия счета. Выберите тот, соответствующий вашим финансовым способностям.

Заключение

Выбор правильного брокера это принципиальный шаг для успешной торговле. Уделите время для исследования и анализа разных вариантов, чтобы найти наиболее подходящий для ваших нужд. Помните, что удачная торговля требует не только правильного выбора брокера, а также хорошей стратегии и управления рисками.

Edwardidogs

22 Jan 2025 - 07:35 am

What New Glenn will do
In some ways, New Glenn has already made its mark on the launch industry. Blue Origin has for years pitched the rocket to compete with both SpaceX and United Launch Alliance — a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin that buys engines from Blue Origin — for lucrative military launch contracts.
[url=https://omgprice10.com]omg ссылка[/url]
The US Space Force selected Blue Origin, ULA and SpaceX in June to compete for $5.6 billion worth of Pentagon contracts for national security missions slated to launch over the next four years.
Blue Origin also has deals with several commercial companies to launch satellites. The contracts include plans to help deploy Amazon’s Kuiper internet satellites and a recently inked deal with AST SpaceMobile to help launch the Midland, Texas-based company’s space-based cellular broadband network.

New Glenn could also be instrumental in building Blue Origin’s planned space station, called Orbital Reef. Blue Origin and it commercial partners, including Sierra Space and Boeing, among others, hope the station will one day provide a new destination for astronauts as the International Space Station is phased out of service.
https://omgprice10.com
omg omg
New Glenn vs. other powerful rockets
New Glenn packs significant power. Dubbed a “heavy-lift” vehicle, its capabilities lie between SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and the more powerful Falcon Heavy launch vehicle.

SpaceX’s workhorse Falcon 9, for example, can haul up to 22.8 metric tons (50,265 pounds) to space. While New Glenn is capable of carrying about double that mass, it may also be roughly the same price as a Falcon 9: reportedly around $60 million to $70 million per launch.

“I think in order to compete with Falcon 9, you have to go head-to-head or better on price,” said Caleb Henry, the director of research at Quilty Space, which provides data and analysis about the space sector.

The question, however, is whether Blue Origin will be able to sustain a competitive price point, Henry added.

Still, one feature that makes New Glenn stand out is its large payload fairing, or nose cone. The component protects the cargo bay and is a whopping 23 feet (7 meters) wide — nearly 6 feet (2 meters) larger than that of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy.

Henry said Blue Origin likely opted to outfit New Glenn with such a large fairing in order to help fulfill Bezos’ vision of the future.

Aviasalesalari

22 Jan 2025 - 07:16 am

Добрый день!
Сайты Авиабилетов Онлайн — это удобный способ найти билеты на самолет по доступным ценам. Мы предлагаем прямые рейсы без пересадок. Все билеты можно купить онлайн через наш сайт. [url=https://www.avialavka.ru/]авиабилет прямой худжанд[/url] Заходите на сайты авиабилетов и находите лучшие предложения!
Более подробно по ссылке - https://www.avialavka.ru/
авиабилеты казань
москва новосибирск авиабилеты
уральский авиабилеты официальный сайт
авиабилеты душанбе

Удачных полетов!

Keiththopy

22 Jan 2025 - 07:14 am

What New Glenn will do
In some ways, New Glenn has already made its mark on the launch industry. Blue Origin has for years pitched the rocket to compete with both SpaceX and United Launch Alliance — a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin that buys engines from Blue Origin — for lucrative military launch contracts.
[url=https://omgprice10.com]omg зеркало[/url]
The US Space Force selected Blue Origin, ULA and SpaceX in June to compete for $5.6 billion worth of Pentagon contracts for national security missions slated to launch over the next four years.
Blue Origin also has deals with several commercial companies to launch satellites. The contracts include plans to help deploy Amazon’s Kuiper internet satellites and a recently inked deal with AST SpaceMobile to help launch the Midland, Texas-based company’s space-based cellular broadband network.

New Glenn could also be instrumental in building Blue Origin’s planned space station, called Orbital Reef. Blue Origin and it commercial partners, including Sierra Space and Boeing, among others, hope the station will one day provide a new destination for astronauts as the International Space Station is phased out of service.
https://omgprice10.com
omg онион
New Glenn vs. other powerful rockets
New Glenn packs significant power. Dubbed a “heavy-lift” vehicle, its capabilities lie between SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and the more powerful Falcon Heavy launch vehicle.

SpaceX’s workhorse Falcon 9, for example, can haul up to 22.8 metric tons (50,265 pounds) to space. While New Glenn is capable of carrying about double that mass, it may also be roughly the same price as a Falcon 9: reportedly around $60 million to $70 million per launch.

“I think in order to compete with Falcon 9, you have to go head-to-head or better on price,” said Caleb Henry, the director of research at Quilty Space, which provides data and analysis about the space sector.

The question, however, is whether Blue Origin will be able to sustain a competitive price point, Henry added.

Still, one feature that makes New Glenn stand out is its large payload fairing, or nose cone. The component protects the cargo bay and is a whopping 23 feet (7 meters) wide — nearly 6 feet (2 meters) larger than that of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy.

Henry said Blue Origin likely opted to outfit New Glenn with such a large fairing in order to help fulfill Bezos’ vision of the future.